.
Feedback

Haddam Land Swap Opponents Question Property Values

Members of the group that opposed the swap want to know why the state's valuations of the land in Tylerville are so much higher than the town's.

 

Though the Haddam “land swap” deal has been declared dead, the opponents of the controversial proposal aren’t yet ready to leave the funeral.

Two of the leaders of the group Citizens for the Protection of Public Lands, say they will press local leaders to explain why the town’s assessment on the 17.4-acre river view land in Tylerville is at least $1.3 million less than the state’s appraisals.

“How could this happen, it’s such a big drop,” said Sharon Botelle, a member of the group that has fought for more than a year against the swap. “It just doesn’t smell right.”

The state yesterday released the appraisals for the river view land, which is owned by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. One of those appraisals put the land’s value at $1.78 million, the other at $1.4 million.

However, following a revaluation of all properties here the town last year reset the land’s value at just $300,540. Previously, the assessor’s value on the land had exceeded $1 million.

At the time, land swap opponents had questioned whether the town had dropped the property’s value in order to bring it more in line with 87 acres in Higganum that a developer was seeking to swap for the 17.4 acres.  That developer, Riverhouse Properties LLC, wanted the Tylerville land for a mixed-use commercial development that would be built next to the firm’s banquet facility.

The state law authorizing the swap required that the private land be worth more or equal to the state land. The appraisals on the Higganum land placed the property’s value at just a fraction of the river view land.

Because of the disparate values between the river view land and the property in Higganum, Riverhouse's partners were required to either give the state other property or money to make the deal equitable. Instead, the developer this week opted out of the deal.

Melissa Schlag Proulx, who has helped lead the opposition to the land swap proposal, said today she also wants the town to investigate the discrepancy in the valuations. Proulx said issues of possible political manipulation aside, the town stands to lose revenues with the lower valuation on the state property.

Under the Payment in Lieu of Taxes, or PILOT program, the state pays towns revenues for land it owns in their municipalities because the town cannot tax that land.

First Selectman Paul DeStefano, who backed the land swap plan, said today he’s not sure why the state’s appraisals came in so much higher than the town’s. The town hired Vision Appraisal Services of Massachusetts to conduct a revaluation of all properties here in 2010 and the company set the land’s new value, he said, which for went into effect during the new tax year in 2011. 

But DeStefano said he doesn’t think the drop in value impacted the town’s PILOT payment significantly. He said he could not immediately recall how much the town gets from the state for the Tylerville land.

He added, however, that he would look into the matter “to see if we’ve left any money on the table.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from The Haddams-Killingworth Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Observor May 18, 2013 at 09:56 am
The State of Connecticut has billions in unfunded pension obligations thanks to the money managementRead More ablities of our state treasurers over the years. Only an AFSCME union boss would trust them.
save our schools May 20, 2013 at 12:42 pm
Resident- Let me get this straight you believe that - BOE did not approve this..... no one saw theRead More report card before it went out ? and I am not sure who has since ? Sad! Well it clearly demonstrates the lack of competence and how well the BOE is informed the in the area of our children's education.
Resident May 17, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Dear save our schools : I have not heard that rumor.... I think where that may have started wasRead More with some people looking at the old middle school and thinking about using it for a vo-ag school, but not at all connected with our school system. I have not heard anything for a while on that whole subject. I have not heard about accreditation issues either... I know about 12 years ago or maybe longer there were issues. My kids are not in the HS. Normally I support our BOE. And it should be noted that the BOE did not approve this... I would tend to bet that if you polled every board member - no one saw this report card system before it went out, and I am not sure who has seen it since. With kids in the middle school now I am keeping an ear open about the HS.
save our schools May 17, 2013 at 12:44 pm
Dear EH Resident, Thank you for a well written and very informative communication. I am a parent ofRead More a recent Hale Ray graduate and have a student currently in the school system. My children are five years apart and it is down right scary to realize how much our school systems quality and rigor has been degraded in recent years. These changes are the direct result of the ill guided Board of Education. Recently I have heard that our high school will soon be becoming a vocational school and will not be accredited . This maybe a rumor but the current path we are on certainly supports the rumor. The loss of accreditation will mean that the diploma our children earn upon graduation will not be accepted by higher education institutions. The mantra of doing less with more is destroying our community. Our children are being robbed of a successful future because of their penny wise pound poor management. We must demand change and accountability from our Board of Education!