No Child Left Behind: 'Good Intentions Gone Horribly Wrong'

The new 'Common Core State Standards' are designed to give students the skills they will need to succeed in college and their careers.

Something big is cooking in the world of education called the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).

According to the mission statement on the CCSS website (www.corestandards.org), “The Common Core State Standards provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them.”  These standards are designed to give students the skills they will need to succeed in college and their careers. 

Let’s back up for a moment and look at where this all fits in with teaching practices and standardized testing.       

Way back in 2001, “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) took effect.  NCLB had good intentions; to increase accountability of schools to meet state standards by tracking student improvement on the tests. After a decade of NCLB, it is common knowledge that this was a case of good intentions gone horribly wrong.

The law mandated annual standardized testing, and for schools to show Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in order to be eligible for state funding.  In addition to losing state funding, failure to make AYP results in a whole host of steps schools must then take to improve test scores, including giving students the option of transferring to a passing school, offering free tutoring, hiring private companies to run the school, or closing the school, depending upon how many years the school fails to meet AYP. 

The goal of AYP is for schools to meet the goal of 100% proficiency by 2013-2014. By 2010, 38% of schools were still failing and, in 2011, several states had failure rates over 50%. (www.edweek.org/ew/issues/no-child-left-behind/)

NCLB has resulted in a culture of “teaching to the test” in order to raise test scores.  Having been a classroom teacher when NCLB hit the fan, I can tell you this is not a little scheme cooked up by teachers in order to look better.  In fact, it goes way beyond the classroom. I was lucky because my principal operated under the belief that, if her teachers were doing their jobs (which she trusted we were), then the students would be well prepared. 

Unfortunately, this was an unusual approach.  The majority of schools spend the bulk of their school year preparing students to take the tests. Anyone who has kids from about 3rd grade on knows this, and is none-too-thrilled about the effect it has on their kids. NCLB has dramatically raised anxiety levels in children, and turned the sea of learning a mile wide and an inch deep, as was stated in the film Race to Nowhere (www.racetonowhere.com).  It’s all drill, drill, drill and very little else.  

Although NCLB is a federal program, it is up to each state to develop academic achievement standards. Actually, states are responsible for developing AYP expectations, and state assessment as well, which has become a major issue.  Many feel that certain states set low standards in order to make it easier for students to meet goals.  Also, it’s a “one-size-fits-all” plan with no room for districts to create improvement plans based on the unique needs of their community. 

So what has all this got to do with the Common Core State Standards that has caused such a splash in education?  I’ll let you know next week.

Robin Hood October 03, 2012 at 12:50 PM
Actually at the core NCLB never had good intentions, neither does StudentsFirst. They are both about getting natiowide contracts to supply schools with materials and other goods and they are worth billions. W's brother and others made out pretty well, Sandy Kress, chief architect of NCLB; Harold McGraw III, textbook publisher; Bill Bennett, former Reagan education secretary; and Neil Bush, the president’s youngest brother, have all cashed in on NCLB. Kress, former president of the Dallas School Board transitioned from public servant to corporate lobbyist, guiding clients to the troth of federal funds. By 2005 he had made upwards of $4 million from lobbying contracts. NCLB benefited the testing industry between $1.9 and $5.3 billion a year. these supplies that are mandated are provided at a price by members of the industry. Among these are McGraw-Hill, Houghton-Mifflin, and Harcourt General. Identified by Wall Street analysts in the wake of the 2000 election as “Bush stocks,” all three represent owners like Harold McGraw III, who has longstanding ties to the Bush administration and the lobbying efforts of Sandy Kress. All of that money takes from local schools and actually hurts their ability to educate students. I taught at a private school when NCLB came to be and we saw a huge drop off in students ability to have simple skills, the schools were cutting in order to have the time for the tests.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »