.
Feedback

Fourth Time Not a Charm For Haddam Land Swap

Sen. Daily would be well-advised to revisit this issue in with the elected officials of Haddam and the Gateway Commission to ensure a transparent transaction is undertaken before a public forum on the proposal.

To the Editor:

For the last several years, Sen. Eileen Daily, D-Westbrook, has repeatedly inserted into pending bills a proposal to enter into a land swap benefiting Steve Rocco and his Riverhouse. This effort could deprive the public of their approval rights in relation to the transfer of 17 acres of public recreational land located above Eagle Landing State Park with a view of the Swing Bridge and Goodspeed Theater.

This proposal was so controversial that the Goodspeed pulled out of its early support.

The aroma of this deal was sufficient that former State Rep. James Spallone alerted the legislature to its presence shortly before the bill which contained the proposal came to the floor. The Legislature pulled the bill without comment.

The former language would have bypassed both the Department of Environmental Protection and the Connecticut River Gateway Commission from their reviews.

In supporting her proposal, Ms. Daily posits that a new DEP commissioner may choose to bypass the Legislature and execute the transfer administratively.

Challenged by the Gateway Commission last week, Ms. Daily defended her decision to push forward with the statement that the language was merely “placeholder” language and could be amended during the hearing. This did not satisfy the commissioners, who said that they oppose the swap because land given to the state for conservation purposes should not be later sold.

I think that we all recall Speaker Pelosi stating that we will all have time to review the Obama administration’s health plan “after it is passed.”

While I am pleased that this time the bill is public, I am very concerned that it may be marked up without the required governmental reviews and public comment.

The 87 acres that would be swapped for this land is a parcel that was part of a proposed real estate development. In value, it may be comparable to the 17 acres being swapped. River overlooks perfectly suited for public vistas and recreation are rapidly being eaten up by development.

On the other hand, the proposal offers an opportunity for a potentially significant addition to commercial development in the Tylerville section of Haddam.

Finding a compromise in the public and private interest will require the same sort of leadership that First Selectman DeStefano maintained as he worked through the thorny issue of the transfer station.

Sen. Daily would be well-advised to revisit this issue in concert with the elected officials of Haddam and the Gateway Commission to ensure a transparent transaction is undertaken before entering a public forum on the proposal. Only then would legislation be ripe for the Legislative action.

There is a process that must be followed in this proposal. Even state senators must remember for whom they work. The people must have their say on the disposition of their public lands.  

Neil Nichols, Essex

Show us some love! Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from The Haddams-Killingworth Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Observor May 18, 2013 at 09:56 am
The State of Connecticut has billions in unfunded pension obligations thanks to the money managementRead More ablities of our state treasurers over the years. Only an AFSCME union boss would trust them.
save our schools May 20, 2013 at 12:42 pm
Resident- Let me get this straight you believe that - BOE did not approve this..... no one saw theRead More report card before it went out ? and I am not sure who has since ? Sad! Well it clearly demonstrates the lack of competence and how well the BOE is informed the in the area of our children's education.
Resident May 17, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Dear save our schools : I have not heard that rumor.... I think where that may have started wasRead More with some people looking at the old middle school and thinking about using it for a vo-ag school, but not at all connected with our school system. I have not heard anything for a while on that whole subject. I have not heard about accreditation issues either... I know about 12 years ago or maybe longer there were issues. My kids are not in the HS. Normally I support our BOE. And it should be noted that the BOE did not approve this... I would tend to bet that if you polled every board member - no one saw this report card system before it went out, and I am not sure who has seen it since. With kids in the middle school now I am keeping an ear open about the HS.
save our schools May 17, 2013 at 12:44 pm
Dear EH Resident, Thank you for a well written and very informative communication. I am a parent ofRead More a recent Hale Ray graduate and have a student currently in the school system. My children are five years apart and it is down right scary to realize how much our school systems quality and rigor has been degraded in recent years. These changes are the direct result of the ill guided Board of Education. Recently I have heard that our high school will soon be becoming a vocational school and will not be accredited . This maybe a rumor but the current path we are on certainly supports the rumor. The loss of accreditation will mean that the diploma our children earn upon graduation will not be accepted by higher education institutions. The mantra of doing less with more is destroying our community. Our children are being robbed of a successful future because of their penny wise pound poor management. We must demand change and accountability from our Board of Education!